Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Technology Integration: What I've Learned



 Hello kind citizens of the Value of Art History Blog ~

The SNHU academic graduate Class 533, Technology Integration, has imparted some remarkably significant changes for me, your guide-by-your-side.  Class 533 has truly empowered me as a possible K-12 Teacher or Technical Instructor.

SNHU Class 533 has taken me on an academic adventure that I really did not foresee or even consider. But it has most assuredly left me far more knowledgeable, more confident in my research and writing skills, and above all, a soldier for technology integration for EVERYBODY who desires to better there life survival skills on this connected globe!

Although I am not entirely positive about my future endeavors as either a K-12 Teacher or, resuming my Technology Instructional work, I am now seeing things so differently, so positively!  Yes, this class did push me – yes, I was wrought with anxiety at times -- but I just knew I could grab this “tiger-by-the-tail” and flourish using my own skills and talents!  Ahead, I now CLEARLY see a leadership role in Technology Integration instead of a hazy muddle of future plans. And yes, I plan to continue to pursue doctoral studies in an educational leadership role. I do believe the world could use some of my written and illustrative direction and guidance in education.

“Technology is a tool that, when paired with effective instructional practices, enables students to develop critical thinking skills through collaboration, sharing, remixing, creating, and analyzing new content and applying that knowledge to real-world situations” (Strickland, 1999).

Currently, the effective integration of technology is at a crossroads.  We know that technology integration is a bridge to improved educational planning. The most urgent issues are an immediate examination of mandated funding for access for all; Common Core Standards; and Brain-Based Educational Strategies as evidence for technology integration.  

The most effective use of technology is to, "transform the nature of a subject at the most fundamental level. Technology-based curricular transformation happens only in those few content areas (e.g., music, literacy, and art) that are "largely defined by the media they use" (Harris, 2008, p. 47).

Several top world academic performers -- South Korea, Finland and Singapore – have moved past the US in world wide academic ratings. 
The endorsement of both district and state standards is, “an almost endless list of things that we would like the next generation of schools to do. It includes critical thinking, foster collaboration, consistent technology integration, and a more consistently student-centered and engaging curriculum approach.  The more highly skilled our teachers are, the greater our chances of achieving these goals” (Mehta, 2013).

Mr. Obama was joined by his education secretary, Arne Duncan, whose department would work with the F.C.C. to revamp the technology in education initiative at 99 percent of schools in the next five years.  Known as E-rate, to provide local schools with Internet speeds of up to 1 gigabit per second.  Also expected is that, private companies will expand their offerings of devices and products like electronic textbooks in response to this expanded program. The commission plans to expand existing programs even if it meant increasing the fees that for years had been added to consumers’ phone bills.

 In conclusion, educators are ethically-bound to properly bridge the digital           divide and consider the manner and quality in which technology integration is used to meet the instructional needs of all students. Teachers  must examine: technology operations and concepts; planning and   designing  learning environments and experiences; teaching, learning and the  curriculum issues; assessment and evaluation; productivity and  professional practice;  and social, ethical, legal and human issues (Willis, 2011).

       Have a very happy, healthy, and e-responsible summer of 2013!
      Lorelei
      SNHU Graduate Student, Fine Artist - illustrator,intaglio,watercolor, writer, Mum,         
      & animal advocate



      References

            Calmes, J. Wyatt, E. (June 2013). Obama Promises to Have High-Speed Internet in Most Schools in 5 Years. Retrieved 10 June 2013 from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/us/politics/obama-to-seek-more-internet-aid-for-schools-and-libraries.html


            Day, L. (2013). Bridging the Digital Divide. Retrieved 11 June 2013 from: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/bridging-the-new-digital-divide-lori-day

               Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. Retrieved 22 May 2013 from SNH Shapiro Library:  http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/274712168?accountid=3783
            Mehta, J. (2013).  Teachers: will we ever learn?  New York Times, Educational Section, April 13, 2013.  Retrieved from New York Times June 6, 2013: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/13/opinion/teachers-will-we-ever-learn.html?pagewanted=all.
            Strickland, C.A. (2004). Differentiation in the general education classroom. Gifted Child Today, 27(3), 7-7.  Retrieved 12 May 2013 from SNHU Shapiro Library: http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/

            Willis, J., MD (2011). Three brain-based learning strategies. Retrieved 11 june 2013 from: http://www.edutopia.org/blog/brain-based-teaching-strategies-judy-willis



o       https://www.iste.org/   









No comments:

Post a Comment